Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Actions at SNC-Lavalin

Over 60 people aged three weeks to their mid-70s joined in a Martin Luther King Day nonviolent action at the Toronto headquarters of SNC-Lavalin, parent company of SNC-TEC, the Quebec-based company which is producing hundreds of millions of bullets for U.S. occupation forces in Iraq.

Almost all Toronto media failed to see why they should haul themselves out to the Etobicoke offices of SNC-Lavalin to do some King Day story about Canadian complicity in American and British war crimes (preferring, as the Toronto Star chose, to do a story about police officers, their guns and night sticks strapped to their belts, addressing school children about King's message of peace, love, and nonviolent conflict resolution!)

But the media absence did not dampen the determination of a group which included a Korean war veteran, WWII veteran, individuals who have in the past few years been on peacemaking missions in Iraq and Palestine, Colombia and Chiapas, and a former Toronto MP who answered the 1965 call from Dr. King to march from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama.

Members of Homes not Bombs, Christian Peacemaker Teams, The Coalition Against War and Racism, The June 30th Organizing Committee (which focuses on Canadian corporate complicity) and the "We Could Use More Waves" affinity group gathered at the Etobicoke facility, where an open letter had been sent the week before seeking an urgent meeting to discuss disentangling SNC-Lavalin from complicity in war crimes (see letter at http://www.homesnotbombs.ca/openlettersnc.htm )

About 15 police officers and assorted private security roamed the grounds keeping watch as the demonstration began with long-time Science for Peace activist Jon Valleau reading out hundreds of names of Iraqis murdered by the war and occupation forces, while others hung dripping blood money from bare tree branches and affixed copies of the Nuremberg Principles and graphic full-colour images of war casualties.

A police officer who had been at the Homes not Bombs Remembrance Day gathering last November (see story at http://www.homesnotbombs.ca/sncremembrance.htm) re-introduced himself to the group, dispensing with the usual "who's in charge?" question by simply laying out the "ground rules" for the day as he saw them, telling us we were not to trespass on the property and that today's protest was to be peaceful. Apparently, he must have seen our nonviolence guidelines!

But today was Martin Luther King Day, surely not a day to be obedient to the orders of arbitrary authority, so his property parameters were promptly ignored as demonstrators made use of the grassy area and trees, and set up shop at both vehicular entrances to read out the endless lists of names of those murdered.

While some employees ventured out for lunch, most stayed inside on this brutally cold day, as we shivered in sub-zero temperatures accentuated by a breeze off Lake Ontario.

About 12:15 pm, the west entrance was completely blocked as the group re-created a roadside-check massacre as it might occur in Iraq. Murray Lumley of Christian Peacemaker Teams and Homes not Bombs set the scene, describing how in many instances a simple misunderstanding has led to tragic consequences. The west entrance to the parking lot was blocked as an individual dressed as an American soldier whipped out a replica machine gun and began "gunning down" those standing around. Their bodies were chalked in outline as stage blood was splattered around them.

Police who normally might have jumped to clear the area seemed stunned at the sudden, hastily organized die-in, and remained in their cars, not even willing to go through the motions of getting out and preparing an order for people to move.

The group then created a human transformation machine, a tunnel-like mechanism whereby first the soldier and then others went through the human machine, entering with guns and bullets and coming out with transformed items such as peace irons, bicycles, and flowers.

David Milne of Christian Peacemaker Teams then spoke powerfully through a megaphone about his three trips to Iraq, of the people he has met and lived with, and of those who have been killed for the crime of simply being in their homes at a time when U.S. forces have entered firing first and asking questions later. His testimony was a powerful one, and he issued a challenge to SNC-Lavalin to divest itself of SNC or, better yet, to transform the institution into something which does not produce the weapons of terror and mass murder.

Matthew Behrens of Homes not Bombs addressed the police and SNC-Lavalin employees peering out from their office windows, informing them of their rights and responsibilities under Canadian and international law, with specific reference to the Nuremberg Principles. He explained a group trained in nonviolence would now attempt to enter the building to conduct an urgent teach-in with the aim of securing a commitment from SNC-Lavalin to divest itself of its bullet-maker.

As Esther Kern read out some speeches from Martin Luther King, a group of "urgent-teach-in" folks who had agreed prior to the action that they would push things to the point of risking arrest gathered in the driveway and began walking towards the front doors. Police, calling out that we were trespassing, massed at the entrance.

In one of those magical moments, the incessant police warnings about trespassing were ignored not only by the small group which had originally planned to be in a civilly disobedient position but by most of the crowd, which gathered behind the teach-in affinity group.

Police told us that we were not welcome, that SNC was not interested in dialogue, and that we should remove ourselves. The group refused to budge.

"Why are you hiding? What are you afraid of? We have no weapons, we have no guns, we have no bullets!" Milne called out in a thundering voice that, without amplification, could likely be heard in the deepest recesses
of the office complex. "I have been in Iraq, that is why I am here, I have seen what happens when you profit off these bullets!" he cried out, his emotional plea clearly affecting the front line of officers and some employees peering through the glass doors.

Police continued their refusal to allow anyone in, and, after pushing us back at a number of intervals, stood silently, trying not to look into our eyes as we held pictures of those who have been maimed and killed and copies of the Nuremberg Principles. Maggie Panter, Kirsten Romaine, Barney Barningham and Ed Babb began writing out the Nuremberg principles on the ground in front of the officers while others chalked slogans on the front walk. A picture of a police officer sternly observing the chalked slogan "SNC Kills" is available at the Hamilton indymedia site at http://hamilton.indymedia.org/media/index.php?function=browse&category=all&submi
t=Browse

Further demonstration shots will shortly be available at http://johnb.smugmug.com, where you click on the Journalism link to find photos of numerous demonstrations taken by the wonderful photographer John Bonnar. They will also be at http://www.torontothebetter.net/2davidentry.htm, taken by veteran chronicler of Canadian social movements David Smiley.

This standoff was followed by a walk around the building's perimeter so that all who work there could see us, with flyers placed on the windshields of the hundreds of cars. We tried the back entrance, and were able to address some workers in the smoking area, but they refused to look at us or engage in dialogue.

"We know you are good people, but the problem now is not the clamour of the bad people but the appalling silence of the good people, just as Martin Luther King explained," someone called out. "You have families, just like the people of Iraq have families. We are all part of one another."

Towards 1 pm, the group decided to close up the rally after one more attempt at entry through the front doors. Seeing we were getting nowhere, we committed to coming back again, singing We Shall Overcome with the final verse, "We'll be back again", and we will (likely during the March days of protest against the occupation).

Rabea Murtaza gathered folks together and asked us to imagine the kind of world where SNC-Lavalin was transformed. "What would YOU like to see the company producing instead of bullets?" she called out, to which
many answers returned, everything from ping pong balls and breastfeeding pillows to "a building that's easier to get into!"

As on many days, today was about choices. The people inside SNC-Lavalin have choices. They can enter a dialogue on ending complicity in war crimes or, if they are afraid to do anything publicly, they can quietly divest themselves of company stock. The police officers too have choices; they can follow the Nuremberg Principles and, rather than acting as an agent for power and privilege, stand aside and let us in, or they can violate the law, as they did today, knowing of war crimes being committed but preventing us from taking positive action to stop them.

But to see the faces of the police was to see conflicted emotions; some looked at the ground, others were clearly holding back some major emotion, especially having heard the first-hand testimonies from Iraq and the wonderful words of Martin Luther King.

Some officers appeared shocked, when, at the conclusion of the demo, we went and shook their hands, wishing them a happy King Day and assuring them that we would be back and that perhaps, next time, they would have a better understanding of the law as well and allow us in, the same hope we shared for SNC-Lavalin.

The demonstration owed major thanks to all participants who braved the freezing cold, to the great folks from the Ontario Common Front Legal Collective, who arranged back-up support and stayed close to the demo at every stage, and the individuals from a variety of groups and cities (London, Burlington, Hamilton, Dundas, Durham, Kitchener, Belleville) who made the journey in to join the protest.

Among those present were the steadfast Burlington/Oakville duo of Gail Lorimer and Doris Cassidy, who continue to maintain a vigil at Burlington's Wescam, a major military manufacturer (targetting equipment) owned by Pentagon powerhouse L-3 Communications (they plan an anti-war gathering there for Friday, May 13, 3 pm, mark your calendars!)

Also present were folks who have been involved in the campaign to stop the militarization of the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE), including the indefatigable Ivona Vujica, who coordinates People Against the Militarization of OISE (PAMO, about which you can find more information at http://www.homesnotbombs.ca/oiseprotest.htm) .

On January 11, some 60-70 people gathered outside OISE, braving miserable weather to hand out flyers and hear discussions about why OISE and all universities in Canada should cut their ties to the military and war corporations.

Last fall, Atlantis Systems, a war simulation and training corporation, announced a partnership with OISE that also involves Canada's War Dept., Toronto junior public schools and Hamilton Health Sciences.

The demonstration raised important questions about the role of any research conducted by OISE: are Toronto school children being observed with the aim of making training for war more efficient and deadly? Why is a Hamilton hospital part of a research project of great interest to a military corporation? What are the guidelines for research contracts and sharing of research? What role does OISE research play in simulation and training projects which lead to improved "kill ratios and bombs-on-target" metrics, things which were discussed at a major simulation conference Atlantis attended in December, 2004?

The contract has spurred a great deal of debate in the University of Toronto community, and People Against the Militarization of OISE are committed to continuing the work to cancel this contract and end the militarization of OISE and educational institutions across Canada.

In the meantime, as peace groups prepare for international days of action against the occupation in Iraq this March, they certainly have a few more places to focus on as we resist the roots of war right here at home. It is far too easy for Canadians (from politicians on down) to feel smug about what is going on in Iraq and say, "we are not part of it," since Bush makes such an easy target for people's anti-war sentiment. But the bigger challenge is to expose and end the hundreds of ways in which Canada directly participates in these war crimes.

1 comment:

Ontario Energy said...

ONTARIO CHOKING ON GAS PLANTS


Ontario's communities under attack from Ontario Power Authority's push to build belching smokestacks in their backyards - supposedly for our electricity.

Taking ENERGY discourse outside of "gas is cleaner than coal" framework.

Taking ENERGY discourse outside of the framework which says "if one community is too angry, we'll build fossil fuel plants in another"

That new gas plant is going up in King Township of North York Region -KING -(just north of Toronto, Ontario) or new high-voltage overhead transmission lines from Markham to Newmarket may not sound alarming to those not directly targeted. But alarming, it should be to all of us!

There are 12 natural gas fired plants underway in Ontario and another 6 in operation since 2006. This means that there are 18 regions in Ontario facing belching smokestacks in their backyard. That is equivalent to 6 -8 coal-fired plants. Adding the proposed gas plant in North York Region, we end up with 19 natural gas plants in Ontario. Anyone else under attack? Please let us know if you don't find yourself on the official list of gas plants. They are springing up like mushrooms everywhere. What is the collective impact of all this burning on Ontario?

If there is any issue which could connect communities with one another into one large movement across the whole province, it is the tyranny of fossil fuel burning in Ontario.

If anything could be the catalyst for the green energy development, the fossil and radioactive fuels dictatorship in Ontario could.

Multiple communities are resisting this type of dirty energy tyranny in Ontario. Communally suited mix of renewables for every building in those communities is the answer they want to see implemented.

Should anyone in Ontario be a host to a fossil fuel burning dinosaur for the sake of their own or someone else's electricity?

NO!!!

We have no right to force fossil fuel burning plants on anyone for our own electricity or for the electricity needed for new "economic growth and developments."

Fossil fuel burning for electricity and heating/cooling is outdated and environmentally destructive technology which threatens our ability to survive as a species.

This is true whether it is in our backyard or not. Wherever these belching dinosaurs are, they are a threat to our survival.

It is a well established scientific fact that burning fossil fuels has caused Global Warming.

We have gassed this Planet with fossil fuel burning to such extent that we are on the brink of extinction.

Global Warming is our daily reality. Fossil fuel burning plants in our backyard hurt people not only locally but the world over.

Consequences include not only extreme and unpredictable weather summed up in two words as "climate chaos" but everything that is emerging from such fatal instability: skyrocketing electricity prices, skyrocketing food prices, blackouts due to interrupted fossil fuel supplies, ripped transmission lines etc.

We live in the midsts of environmental and energy crises caused by fossil fuel burning called Global Warming.

Adding Greenhouse Gases to our collective atmosphere is a crime against humanity.

The basic requirement for our survival is putting immediate stoppage to fossil fuel burning!

It is in this context of Global Warming that Ontario Power Authority is forcing fossil fuel burning on many Ontario's communities. Why is OPA trying to have multiple communities in Ontario host this crime against humanity?

Temporary Profit? NOT IN OUR NA ME, OPA/ONTARIO GOVERNMENT!

Communally designed integrated renewable energy technologies (geothermal, solar, wind, biogas) harness energy which is free and limitless. If installation of such technologies is not publicly subsidized the way it SHOULD BE, they pay for themselves. They also eliminate electricity and heating bills as energy supplies are in the local renewable commons domain. This is especially true if people own such technologies. Nature friendly technologies should be people friendly technologies.

In addition, they eliminate the need for invasion and occupation of land for fuel supplies. Indeed sunshine, wind, biogas, earth's heat or cooling differ from coal or uranium BIG TIME. For example, the land of Appalachian people in the United States is literally consumed to the bare bone so that coal from their mountains can be burned in Ontario's coal-fired plants - for our energy. Ontarians should not be sucking on Appalachian coal for our energy!!! Close down coal-fired plants in Ontario - ASAP!

Energy for our electricity and heating/cooling must not come from environmentally destructive practices nor human rights abuses.

It is not only that we can, but we must go green: mix of renewable energy technologies for every building; energy efficiencies for every building.

We have developers ready to transform Ontario into a modern environmentally and people-friendly province. It is OPA, however, that is selecting fossil fuel burning developers instead . Competition process to build new energy supply is not open to all energy technology developers. There is no competition process in which those most environmentally and people friendly energy technologies could win.

OPA artificially opens competition to only one type of energy developers according to their personal personal preference and interest: fossil fuel burning developers - in the time when fossil fuel burning is rejected outright by every community - including the world's scientific and peoples' community.

And what's a community to do when the law protects OPA's undemocratic decisions?

Bill 51 prevents people from appealing construction of a plant. First, communities are not even informed or consulted. OPA will try to interject to prove how much they are doing to keep targeted communities informed. Unfortunately, this does not count as long as people feel they are not informed or consulted properly and as long as people feel they are being walked over by the OPA fossil fuel burning bulldozers.

By the time communities start scrambling on their own, OPA is deep in the process of seeking bids from fossil fuel developers, and people are up against Bill 51 - no right to appeal plant construction according to law.

For example, the structure of the Town of Aurora Council Public Meeting on Wednesday April 30 at 7pm features a panel of speakers - all of them in favour of fossil fuel burning - one is from Ontario Power Authority, one from Association of Power Producers (represents more than 100 energy corporations in Ontario) , one from Power Stream (electricity distribution company in the area), and one is from Ontario Clean Air Alliance (OCAA) which supported building of the Portlands gas plant on Toronto's waterfront against the wishes of the community. OCAA opposes the KING gas plant not because of the grave dangers of fossil fuel burning but because the proposed plant is not the right type of a gas plant to do it more efficiently.

Well this public meeting in Aurora is structured so that the panelists have 10 minutes each to present their views. Public is allowed to pose one question each and panelist have 2 minutes each to answer the questions coming from concerned people. This sounds like a very tightly controlled corporate event. This is not public info session or consultation.

In their independent fact finding mission regarding the proposed gas plant, a group of KING residents called King Countryside Stewardship Alliance (KCSA) contacted OPA asking questions, but either never received response or received responses which didn't answer their questions.

OPA uses other tactics as well.

In North York Region (just north of Toronto), OPA has managed to pit two communities against each other: if the gas plant is not built in King Township of NYR then high voltage transmission lines will be built over the residences and schools in Markham and Aurora of NYR and vice versa.

Residents fighting new transmission lines in Markham and Aurora called S.T.O.P (Stop Transmission Lines Over People) are supporting OPA's decision to build the gas plant in King Township because this would temporarily solve their own problem in Aurora and Markham. Not only are they siding with OPA, but they are showing open hostility towards the King Countryside Stewardship Alliance. After their March 30 community meeting trying to discuss implications of a new gas plant for their countryside green environment, KING residents of KCSA were accused by S.T.O.P. of spreading "inaccuracies" about the gas plant and that since they don't want the gas plant, "transmission [is their] preferred solution."

Nothing can be further from truth because King Countryside Stewardship Alliance rose above OPA's either/or trap saying that they do NOT support either the gas plant or transmission lines.

They are on the right track. Both communities, King Countryside Stewardship Alliance and S.T.O.P. should unite under one banner of calling for full implementation of renewable energy technologies not only as a prerequisite for new "economic growth and development" but for existing infrastructure as well. And then, S.T.O.P and KING should be uniting with other 18 communities in the same situation together with the renewable energy developers - demanding GREEN ENERGY ONLY.

Natural gas plants abuse air, water and soil. They are adding CO2 to the collective atmosphere further gassing the planet and endangering our survival. They c onsume thousands of gallons of water per minute. They discharge water full of heavy metals and toxins back into environment. All heavy metals and toxins from belching smokestacks settle on water, land and dwellings. Through water, air and food, they accumulate in our bodies and cause diseases targeting respiratory system, heart and brain. In particular, they harm development of children during gestation resulting in birth defects and brain damage. And if residents want clean water, they have to pay for privatized industrial waste treatment facilities. The cost of cleaning water that shouldn't have been polluted in the first place is prohibitive.

Gas plants need pipes for natural gas to be piped to the place of its burning and the natural gas is usually secured through armed occupation and exploitation of Aboriginal and foreign lands. Same goes for coal (coal-fired plants) or uranium (nuclear plants).

Fossil - and radioactive fuel-burning plants destroy a lot of environment and people's lives in order to produce a bit of our energy.

NO ONE NEEDS SUCH ENERGY!

Indeed, "need" for energy is the wool OPA is pulling over NYR residents' eyes. OPA is saying we are doing you a favour because you NYR residents "need" the energy. According to Ontario Clean Air Alliance, NYR has more energy than they need right now. Never take statement that we "need" energy for granted. This is not true until we prove it is true through independent review and study process of our energy needs in Ontario, and until we identify and list those that need it. Ontarians have become champions at conserving energy. They have used less energy in current years than in the past.

Following questions beg answers: Who needs energy? OPA is talking about new development. What development in particular needs energy? Let's identify the one that's so needy that a natural gas plant is forced upon communities who don't want it.

Any new development should be installing their own green energy. What kind of "development" and "growth" is that which is necessitating environmental destruction and tyranny? Ontario communities are saying NO to such fossil - and radioactive fuel dictatorship imposed by OPA.

Around 3500 MW of energy, OPA exported to the United States in 2006. This is almost the amount of energy produced by the Nanticoke, the biggest and dirtiest coal fired plant in North America located right here in Ontario.

Ontario government is saying we need coal fired plants until 2014 for our energy. This is not true.

Thousands of megawatts of our energy is exported - WE DO NOT NEED IT!!!

WHAT WE NEED IS INTEGRATED RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR NEW and EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE - NOW!!!

NO MORE NUCLEAR!
NO MORE NATURAL GAS!
NO MORE COAL!

Please write in support of GREEN ENERGY ONLY FOR OUR ONTARIO!!!

Submit your comments to the "forum discussing" Energy in Aurora and Northern York Region - April 30, 2008 http://www.town.aurora.on.ca/aurora/index.aspx?ArticleID=1960〈=en-CA

Say to them that:

BUILDING OF FOSSIL FUEL BURNING PLANTS SHOULD BE OUTRIGHT PROHIBITED BECAUSE FOSSIL FUEL BURNING HAS CREATED UNPRECEDENTED ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CRISES LOCALLY AND GLOBALLY THREATENING OUR VERY SURVIVAL.

BEING THE ROOT CAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING AND DEADLY CLIMATE CHAOS, FOSSIL FUEL BURNING IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.

IT IS OUTDATED and ENVIRONMENTALLY DESTRUCTIVE WAY OF PRODUCING ENERGY

PEOPLE OF ONTARIO REJECT OUTRIGHT FOSSIL FUEL BURNING PLANTS IN THEIR COMMUNITIES. IT IS PEOPLE'S DECISIONS TO HAVE GREEN ENERGY ONLY THAT MUST BE RESPECTED BY THE GOVERNMENT

ONTARIO GOVERNMENT IS FORCING ON ONTARIANS and THE REST OF THIS WORLD FOSSIL FUEL BURNING AGAINST THEIR COLLECTIVE WILL AND IS SO CREATING FOSSIL FUEL ENERGY DICTATORSHIP IN ONTARIO THROUGH SELF INTERESTED, ONE-SIDED DECISION MAKING AND UNJUST, AND TYRANNICAL LAWS - ABSOLUTELY IGNORING PEOPLE' S WILL -

PEOPLE ARE UNITING TO FIGHT FOR ENERGY WHICH DOES NOT COME FROM ARMED OCCUPATION OF ABORIGINAL AND FOREIGN LANDS TO SECURE FOSSIL AND RADIOACTIVE FUEL SUPPLIES

COMMUNALLY SUITED MIX OF GREEN ENERGIES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AND IMPLEMENTED AS AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CRISES CREATED BY FOSSIL FUEL BURNING

TRANSFER ALL THE PUBLIC BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM SUBSIDIZING FOSSIL AND RADIOACTIVE BURNING PLANTS INTO GREEN ENERGY ONLY FULL PUBLIC SUBSIDIES FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR EVERYONE IN ONTARIO WITHOUT DELAY - NOW!

FOSSIL AND RADIOACTIVE FUELS CARTEL/MONOPOLY/TYRANNY/DICTATORSHIP IN ONTARIO MUST BE DISMANTLED WITHOUT DELAY.

OPA HAS TO REINVENT ITSELF FOR THE ERA OF GREEN ENERGY ONLY.

ONTARIO COMMUNITIES UNDER ATTACK. WHAT DO WE DO?

STAND UP, FIGHT BACK!!!

REFERENCES:

"I don't think they're straight with us at all." King Township residents fight gas plant plan National Post March 31, 2008 http://www.nationalpost.com/todays_paper/Story.html?id=411343

"Well, let's see who is misleading whom," King residents raise concern over a letter sent by OPA to Mayor Black The King Sentinel Township April 16, 2008 http://www.kingsentinel.com/news/2008/0416/news/005.html

"They are either lying or incompetent, or both!" A History of the MHA's Involvement With The Proposed Natural Gas Power Plant http://www.marklandwood.org/Eastern_History.htm

Monstrous toxin-spewing invader, say the residents of Milton http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2006/10/30/power-to-the-people/

Fight against Bill 51, which eliminates the right of appeal on power plant construction IS NOT OVER http://www.thehaltonherald.ca/phpnuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=156

"if they took money to allow these people to pollute, then shame on them" If a community is only w orth the planning put into it, what's Halton Hills worth? The Halton Herald December 19, 2006 http://www.thehaltonherald.ca/phpnuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=171

"..proposed energy centre just doesn't make sense ... Air studies done in downtown Toronto show pollution levels near hazardous thresholds.." Fletcher and Tabuns derail Portlands Energy Centre 06 21, 2006 http://www.readingt.readingcities.com/index.php/toronto/comments/fletcher_and_tabuns_derail_portland_energy_centre/

OPA's lists of natural gas plants (two websites):
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&SiteNodeID=236 http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&SiteNodeID=174

Aurora Council Public Meeting Agenda http://www.town.aurora.on.ca/aurora/index.aspx?ArticleID=1957〈=en-CA

Richard Johnson of S.T.O.P.: "...transmission is [KCSA's] preferred solution..." http://www.aurorapowerupdate.com/Home/readmore/tabid/359/language/en-US/Default.aspx

Ontario Clean Air Alliance. Too big, too costly and too polluting http://www.cleanairalliance.org/nyr

Abolition of Coal-Fired Plants Everywhere - No Nukes! http://quebec.indymedia.org/en/node/28427

do some googling: Global Warming, CO2 Emissions, Planetary Survival Reports are so scary that I'll let you find them on your own.

Google: Abolition Coal

Ivona Vujica
OTTAWA - ONTARIO
613 421 6126
ivujica@gmail.com

CC: RENEWABLE ENERGIES ASSOCIATIONS
ONTARIO'S RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPERS

OPA, OPG, STOP, KCSA, OCAA, PSEA .....

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW OFFICES

GREEN NGOs

EVERYONE

For more information contact:

Ivona Vujica
Green Energy Only
Email: ivujica@gmail.com
URL: http://floodiceorfire.wordpress.com/

Would you like to see your news and articles here? GO>>